aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2014-04-30 14:23:26 -0700
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2014-05-02 13:24:57 -0700
commitdd30800bcd236233c82da80bba0d00956a246260 (patch)
treeba38a74663f3cc69f766cda41b089e96d7b09281 /Documentation
parent7e76a2f97546444fe7a2af18825450e29c3622a4 (diff)
downloadgit-dd30800bcd236233c82da80bba0d00956a246260.tar.gz
git-dd30800bcd236233c82da80bba0d00956a246260.tar.xz
CodingGuidelines: once it is in, it is not worth the code churn
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/CodingGuidelines8
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
index f424dbd75..c405b0b9d 100644
--- a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
+++ b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
@@ -18,6 +18,14 @@ code. For Git in general, three rough rules are:
judgement call, the decision based more on real world
constraints people face than what the paper standard says.
+ - Fixing style violations while working on a real change as a
+ preparatory clean-up step is good, but otherwise avoid useless code
+ churn for the sake of conforming to the style.
+
+ "Once it _is_ in the tree, it's not really worth the patch noise to
+ go and fix it up."
+ Cf. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/943020
+
Make your code readable and sensible, and don't try to be clever.
As for more concrete guidelines, just imitate the existing code