aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>2012-03-13 00:00:36 -0500
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2012-03-13 14:26:32 -0700
commit2593633f5a7e1ddc02cd5f8256d02a53324e4cf6 (patch)
tree76f10914e1e8451372a11180caada782d0ac0d13 /t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh
parentef7db1933b6d4ae466a1b248a98c7ed9d1d65a41 (diff)
downloadgit-2593633f5a7e1ddc02cd5f8256d02a53324e4cf6.tar.gz
git-2593633f5a7e1ddc02cd5f8256d02a53324e4cf6.tar.xz
test: test cherry-pick functionality and output separately
Since v1.7.3-rc0~26^2~9 (revert: report success when using option --strategy, 2010-07-14), the cherry-pick-many-commits test checks the format of output written to the terminal during a cherry-pick sequence in addition to the functionality. There is no reason those have to be checked in the same test, though, and it has some downsides: - when progress output is broken, the test result does not convey whether the functionality was also broken or not - it is not immediately obvious when reading that these checks are meant to prevent regressions in details of the output format and are not just a roundabout way to check functional details like the number of commits produced - there is a temptation to include the same kind of output checking for every new cherry-pick test, which would make future changes to the output unnecessarily difficult Put the tests from v1.7.3-rc0~26^2~9 in separate assertions, following the principle "test one feature at a time". Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh')
-rwxr-xr-xt/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh30
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh b/t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh
index d909e6dbc..75f7ff4f2 100755
--- a/t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh
+++ b/t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh
@@ -35,6 +35,16 @@ test_expect_success setup '
'
test_expect_success 'cherry-pick first..fourth works' '
+ git checkout -f master &&
+ git reset --hard first &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git cherry-pick first..fourth &&
+ git diff --quiet other &&
+ git diff --quiet HEAD other &&
+ check_head_differs_from fourth
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'output to keep user entertained during multi-pick' '
cat <<-\EOF >expected &&
[master OBJID] second
Author: A U Thor <author@example.com>
@@ -51,15 +61,22 @@ test_expect_success 'cherry-pick first..fourth works' '
git reset --hard first &&
test_tick &&
git cherry-pick first..fourth >actual &&
+ sed -e "s/$_x05[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]/OBJID/" <actual >actual.fuzzy &&
+ test_line_count -ge 3 actual.fuzzy &&
+ test_i18ncmp expected actual.fuzzy
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'cherry-pick --strategy resolve first..fourth works' '
+ git checkout -f master &&
+ git reset --hard first &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git cherry-pick --strategy resolve first..fourth &&
git diff --quiet other &&
git diff --quiet HEAD other &&
-
- sed -e "s/$_x05[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]/OBJID/" <actual >actual.fuzzy &&
- test_i18ncmp expected actual.fuzzy &&
check_head_differs_from fourth
'
-test_expect_success 'cherry-pick --strategy resolve first..fourth works' '
+test_expect_success 'output during multi-pick indicates merge strategy' '
cat <<-\EOF >expected &&
Trying simple merge.
[master OBJID] second
@@ -79,11 +96,8 @@ test_expect_success 'cherry-pick --strategy resolve first..fourth works' '
git reset --hard first &&
test_tick &&
git cherry-pick --strategy resolve first..fourth >actual &&
- git diff --quiet other &&
- git diff --quiet HEAD other &&
sed -e "s/$_x05[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]/OBJID/" <actual >actual.fuzzy &&
- test_i18ncmp expected actual.fuzzy &&
- check_head_differs_from fourth
+ test_i18ncmp expected actual.fuzzy
'
test_expect_success 'cherry-pick --ff first..fourth works' '