aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>2006-03-02 22:28:17 +0100
committerJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>2006-03-02 15:10:39 -0800
commitfc675b8cd5ac102651c322e05d27c4fa7609f7a6 (patch)
tree2e8587f09b0527c5d4bffe2009ea2180ef112b64 /t
parentc40610422e1157e71dbc3c1a2f9e19bbe117962f (diff)
downloadgit-fc675b8cd5ac102651c322e05d27c4fa7609f7a6.tar.gz
git-fc675b8cd5ac102651c322e05d27c4fa7609f7a6.tar.xz
git-blame, take 2
Here is an updated version of git-blame. The main changes compared to the first version are: * Use the new revision.h interface to do the revision walking * Do the right thing in a lot of more cases than before. In particular parallel development tracks are hopefully handled sanely. * Lots of clean-up It still won't follow file renames though. There are still some differences in the output between git-blame and git-annotate. For example, in 'Makefile' git-blame assigns lines 354-358 to 455a7f3275d264f6e66045b92c83747ec461dda5 and git-annotate assigns the same lines to 79a9d8ea0d88a3667ad19be8e705405ab5d896f1. I think git-blame is correct in this case. This patterns occur in several other places, git-annotate seems to sometimes assign lines to merge commits when the lines actually changed in some other commit which precedes the merge. [jc: I have conned Ryan into doing test cases, so that it would help development and fixes on both implementations. Let the battle begin! ;-) ] Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Diffstat (limited to 't')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions