Fix various sparse warnings in the git source code

There are a few remaining ones, but this fixes the trivial ones. It boils
down to two main issues that sparse complains about:

 - warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

   Sparse doesn't like you using '0' instead of 'NULL'. For various good
   reasons, not the least of which is just the visual confusion. A NULL
   pointer is not an integer, and that whole "0 works as NULL" is a
   historical accident and not very pretty.

   A few of these remain: zlib is a total mess, and Z_NULL is just a 0.
   I didn't touch those.

 - warning: symbol 'xyz' was not declared. Should it be static?

   Sparse wants to see declarations for any functions you export. A lack
   of a declaration tends to mean that you should either add one, or you
   should mark the function 'static' to show that it's in file scope.

   A few of these remain: I only did the ones that should obviously just
   be made static.

That 'wt_status_submodule_summary' one is debatable. It has a few related
flags (like 'wt_status_use_color') which _are_ declared, and are used by
builtin-commit.c. So maybe we'd like to export it at some point, but it's
not declared now, and not used outside of that file, so 'static' it is in
this patch.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c
index 8eb3ddb39..05d0bb1f8 100644
--- a/unpack-trees.c
+++ b/unpack-trees.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int unpack_index_entry(struct cache_entry *ce, struct unpack_trees_option
 	return call_unpack_fn(src, o);
 }
 
-int traverse_trees_recursive(int n, unsigned long dirmask, unsigned long df_conflicts, struct name_entry *names, struct traverse_info *info)
+static int traverse_trees_recursive(int n, unsigned long dirmask, unsigned long df_conflicts, struct name_entry *names, struct traverse_info *info)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct tree_desc t[MAX_UNPACK_TREES];