aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/alloc.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* unbreak and eliminate NO_C99_FORMATJonathan Nieder2011-03-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In the spirit of v1.5.0.2~21 (Check for PRIuMAX rather than NO_C99_FORMAT in fast-import.c, 2007-02-20), use PRIuMAX from git-compat-util.h on all platforms instead of C99-specific formats like %zu with dangerous fallbacks to %u or %lu. So now C99-challenged platforms can build git without provoking warnings or errors from printf, even if pointers do not have the same size as an int or long. The need for a fallback PRIuMAX is detected in git-compat-util.h with "#ifndef PRIuMAX". So while at it, simplify the Makefile and configure script by eliminating the NO_C99_FORMAT knob altogether. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Fix a bunch of pointer declarations (codestyle)Felipe Contreras2009-05-01
| | | | | | | Essentially; s/type* /type */ as per the coding guidelines. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Clean up object creation to use more common codeLinus Torvalds2007-04-16
| | | | | | | | | This replaces the fairly odd "created_object()" function that did _most_ of the object setup with a more complete "create_object()" function that also has a more natural calling convention. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* Use proper object allocators for unknown object nodes tooLinus Torvalds2007-04-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We used to use a different allocator scheme for when we didn't know the object type. That meant that objects that were created without any up-front knowledge of the type would not go through the same allocation paths as normal object allocations, and would miss out on the statistics. But perhaps more importantly than the statistics (that are useful when looking at memory usage but not much else), if we want to make the object hash tables use a denser object pointer representation, we need to make sure that they all go through the same blocking allocator. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* Add NO_C99_FORMAT to support older compilers.Ramsay Allan Jones2006-08-02
| | | | | | | | | The NO_C99_FORMAT macro allows compilers that lack support for the ll,hh,j,z,t size specifiers (eg. gcc 2.95.2) to adapt the code to avoid runtime errors in the formatted IO functions. Signed-off-by: Ramsay Allan Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* Add specialized object allocatorLinus Torvalds2006-06-19
This creates a simple specialized object allocator for basic objects. This avoids wasting space with malloc overhead (metadata and extra alignment), since the specialized allocator knows the alignment, and that objects, once allocated, are never freed. It also allows us to track some basic statistics about object allocations. For example, for the mozilla import, it shows object usage as follows: blobs: 627629 (14710 kB) trees: 1119035 (34969 kB) commits: 196423 (8440 kB) tags: 1336 (46 kB) and the simpler allocator shaves off about 2.5% off the memory footprint off a "git-rev-list --all --objects", and is a bit faster too. [ Side note: this concludes the series of "save memory in object storage". The thing is, there simply isn't much more to be saved on the objects. Doing "git-rev-list --all --objects" on the mozilla archive has a final total RSS of 131498 pages for me: that's about 513MB. Of that, the object overhead is now just 56MB, the rest is going somewhere else (put another way: the fact that this patch shaves off 2.5% of the total memory overhead, considering that objects are now not much more than 10% of the total shows how big the wasted space really was: this makes object allocations much more memory- and time-efficient). I haven't looked at where the rest is, but I suspect the bulk of it is just the pack-file loading. It may be that we should pack the tree objects separately from the blob objects: for git-rev-list --objects, we don't actually ever need to even look at the blobs, but since trees and blobs are interspersed in the pack-file, we end up not being dense in the tree accesses, so we end up looking at more pages than we strictly need to. So with a 535MB pack-file, it's entirely possible - even likely - that most of the remaining RSS is just the mmap of the pack-file itself. We don't need to map in _all_ of it, but we do end up mapping a fair amount. ] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>