aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-add--interactive.perl
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* perl: use "use warnings" instead of -wÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2010-09-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change the Perl scripts to turn on lexical warnings instead of setting the global $^W variable via the -w switch. The -w sets warnings for all code that interpreter runs, while "use warnings" is lexically scoped. The former is probably not what the authors wanted. As an auxiliary benefit it's now possible to build Git with: PERL_PATH='/usr/bin/env perl' Which would previously result in failures, since "#!/usr/bin/env perl -w" doesn't work as a shebang. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* perl: bump the required Perl version to 5.8 from 5.6.[21]Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2010-09-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Formalize our dependency on perl 5.8, bumped from 5.6.[12]. We already used the three-arg form of open() which was introduced in 5.6.1, but t/t9700/test.pl explicitly depended on 5.6.2. However git-add--interactive.pl has been failing on the 5.6 line since it was introduced in v1.5.0-rc0~12^2~2 back in 2006 due to this open syntax: sub run_cmd_pipe { my $fh = undef; open($fh, '-|', @_) or die; return <$fh>; } Which when executed dies on "Can't use an undefined value as filehandle reference". Several of our tests also fail on 5.6 (even more when compiled with NO_PERL_MAKEMAKER=1): t2016-checkout-patch.sh t3904-stash-patch.sh t3701-add-interactive.sh t7105-reset-patch.sh t7501-commit.sh t9700-perl-git.sh Our code is bitrotting on 5.6 with no-one interested in fixing it, and pinning us to such an ancient release of Perl is keeping us from using useful features introduced in the 5.8 release. The 5.6 series is now over 10 years old, and the 5.6.2 maintenance release almost 7. 5.8 on the other hand is more than 8 years old. All the modern Unix-like operating systems have now upgraded to it or a later version, and 5.8 packages are available for old IRIX, AIX Solaris and Tru64 systems. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Acked-by: Tor Arntsen <tor@spacetec.no> Acked-by: Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* add-interactive: Clarify “remaining hunks in the file”Jonathan Nieder2010-06-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The "a" and "d" commands to ‘add --patch’ (accept/reject rest of file) interact with "j", "g", and "/" (skip some hunks) in a perhaps confusing way: after accepting or rejecting all _later_ hunks in the file, they return to the earlier, skipped hunks and prompt the user about them again. This behavior can be very useful in practice. One can still accept or reject _all_ undecided hunks in a file by using the "g" command to move to hunk #1 first. Reported-by: Frédéric Brière <fbriere@fbriere.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'jk/maint-add--interactive-delete'Junio C Hamano2010-03-07
|\ | | | | | | | | * jk/maint-add--interactive-delete: add-interactive: fix bogus diff header line ordering
| * add-interactive: fix bogus diff header line orderingJeff King2010-02-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When we look at a patch for adding hunks interactively, we first split it into a header and a list of hunks. Some of the header lines, such as mode changes and deletion, however, become their own selectable hunks. Later when we reassemble the patch, we simply concatenate the header and the selected hunks. This leads to patches like this: diff --git a/file b/file index d95f3ad..0000000 --- a/file +++ /dev/null deleted file mode 100644 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -content Notice how the deletion comes _after_ the ---/+++ lines, when it should come before. In many cases, we can get away with this as git-apply accepts the slightly bogus input. However, in the specific case of a deletion line that is being applied via "apply -R", this malformed patch triggers an assert in git-apply. This comes up when discarding a deletion via "git checkout -p". Rather than try to make git-apply accept our odd input, let's just reassemble the patch in the correct order. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'maint'Junio C Hamano2009-12-08
|\ \ | |/ | | | | | | | | * maint: add-interactive: fix deletion of non-empty files pull: clarify advice for the unconfigured error case
| * Merge branch 'jk/maint-add-p-delete-fix' into maintJunio C Hamano2009-12-08
| |\ | | | | | | | | | | | | * jk/maint-add-p-delete-fix: add-interactive: fix deletion of non-empty files
| | * add-interactive: fix deletion of non-empty filesJeff King2009-12-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 24ab81a fixed the deletion of empty files, but broke deletion of non-empty files. The approach it took was to factor out the "deleted" line from the patch header into its own hunk, the same way we do for mode changes. However, unlike mode changes, we only showed the special "delete this file" hunk if there were no other hunks. Otherwise, the user would annoyingly be presented with _two_ hunks: one for deleting the file and one for deleting the content. This meant that in the non-empty case, we forgot about the deleted line entirely, and we submitted a bogus patch to git-apply (with "/dev/null" as the destination file, but not marked as a deletion). Instead, this patch combines the file deletion hunk and the content deletion hunk (if there is one) into a single deletion hunk which is either staged or not. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * | Merge branch 'jk/maint-add-p-empty' into maintJunio C Hamano2009-11-16
| |\ \ | | |/ | | | | | | | | | * jk/maint-add-p-empty: add-interactive: handle deletion of empty files
| * | Merge branch 'pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude' into maintJunio C Hamano2009-10-23
| |\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude: git-add--interactive: never skip files included in index
* | \ \ Merge branch 'jn/editor-pager'Junio C Hamano2009-11-20
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * jn/editor-pager: Provide a build time default-pager setting Provide a build time default-editor setting am -i, git-svn: use "git var GIT_PAGER" add -i, send-email, svn, p4, etc: use "git var GIT_EDITOR" Teach git var about GIT_PAGER Teach git var about GIT_EDITOR Suppress warnings from "git var -l" Do not use VISUAL editor on dumb terminals Handle more shell metacharacters in editor names
| * | | | add -i, send-email, svn, p4, etc: use "git var GIT_EDITOR"Jonathan Nieder2009-11-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Use the new "git var GIT_EDITOR" feature to decide what editor to use, instead of duplicating its logic elsewhere. This should make the behavior of commands in edge cases (e.g., editor names with spaces) a little more consistent. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | | | Merge branch 'jk/maint-add-p-empty'Junio C Hamano2009-11-15
|\ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / / |/| | | / | | |_|/ | |/| | * jk/maint-add-p-empty: add-interactive: handle deletion of empty files
| * | | add-interactive: handle deletion of empty filesJeff King2009-10-27
| |/ / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Usually we show deletion as a big hunk deleting all of the file's text. However, for files with no content, the diff shows just the 'deleted file mode ...' line. This patch cause "add -p" (and related commands) to recognize that line and explicitly ask about deleting the file. We only add the "stage this deletion" hunk for empty files, since other files will already ask about the big content deletion hunk. We could also change those files to simply display "stage this deletion", but showing the actual deleted content is probably what an interactive user wants. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | Merge branch 'pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude'Junio C Hamano2009-10-14
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| / | |/ | | * pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude: git-add--interactive: never skip files included in index
| * git-add--interactive: never skip files included in indexPauli Virtanen2009-10-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Make "git add -p" to not skip files that are in index even if they are excluded (by .gitignore etc.). This fixes the contradictory behavior that "git status" and "git commit -a" listed such files as modified, but "git add -p FILENAME" ignored them. Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * Merge branch 'tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix' into maint-1.6.3Junio C Hamano2009-08-26
| |\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix: add -p: do not attempt to coalesce mode changes git add -p: demonstrate failure when staging both mode and hunk
* | \ Merge branch 'tr/reset-checkout-patch'Junio C Hamano2009-09-07
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * tr/reset-checkout-patch: stash: simplify defaulting to "save" and reject unknown options Make test case number unique tests: disable interactive hunk selection tests if perl is not available DWIM 'git stash save -p' for 'git stash -p' Implement 'git stash save --patch' Implement 'git checkout --patch' Implement 'git reset --patch' builtin-add: refactor the meat of interactive_add() Add a small patch-mode testing library git-apply--interactive: Refactor patch mode code Make 'git stash -k' a short form for 'git stash save --keep-index'
| * | | Implement 'git stash save --patch'Thomas Rast2009-08-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This adds a hunk-based mode to git-stash. You can select hunks from the difference between HEAD and worktree, and git-stash will build a stash that reflects these changes. The index state of the stash is the same as your current index, and we also let --patch imply --keep-index. Note that because the selected hunks are rolled back from the worktree but not the index, the resulting state may appear somewhat confusing if you had also staged these changes. This is not entirely satisfactory, but due to the way stashes are applied, other solutions would require a change to the stash format. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * | | Implement 'git checkout --patch'Thomas Rast2009-08-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This introduces a --patch mode for git-checkout. In the index usage git checkout --patch -- [files...] it lets the user discard edits from the <files> at the granularity of hunks (by selecting hunks from 'git diff' and then reverse applying them to the worktree). We also accept a revision argument. In the case git checkout --patch HEAD -- [files...] we offer hunks from the difference between HEAD and the worktree, and reverse applies them to both index and worktree, allowing you to discard staged changes completely. In the non-HEAD usage git checkout --patch <revision> -- [files...] it offers hunks from the difference between the worktree and <revision>. The chosen hunks are then applied to both index and worktree. The application to worktree and index is done "atomically" in the sense that we first check if the patch applies to the index (it should always apply to the worktree). If it does not, we give the user a choice to either abort or apply to the worktree anyway. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * | | Implement 'git reset --patch'Thomas Rast2009-08-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This introduces a --patch mode for git-reset. The basic case is git reset --patch -- [files...] which acts as the opposite of 'git add --patch -- [files...]': it offers hunks for *un*staging. Advanced usage is git reset --patch <revision> -- [files...] which offers hunks from the diff between the index and <revision> for forward application to the index. (That is, the basic case is just <revision> = HEAD.) Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * | | git-apply--interactive: Refactor patch mode codeThomas Rast2009-08-14
| |/ / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This makes some aspects of the 'git add -p' loop configurable (within the code), so that we can later reuse git-add--interactive for other similar tools. Most fields are fairly straightforward, but APPLY gets a subroutine (instead of just a string a la 'apply --cached') so that we can handle 'checkout -p', which will need to atomically apply the patch twice (index and worktree). Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | Merge branch 'tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix'Junio C Hamano2009-08-18
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| / | |/ | | | | * tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix: add -p: do not attempt to coalesce mode changes git add -p: demonstrate failure when staging both mode and hunk
| * add -p: do not attempt to coalesce mode changesThomas Rast2009-08-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In 0392513 (add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handling, 2009-04-16), we merged the interaction loops for mode changes and hunk staging. This was fine at the time, because 0beee4c (git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing, 2008-07-02) removed hunk coalescing. However, in 7a26e65 (Revert "git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing", 2009-05-16), we resurrected it. Since then, the code would attempt in vain to merge mode changes with diff hunks, corrupting both in the process. We add a check to the coalescing loop to ensure it only looks at diff hunks, thus skipping mode changes. Noticed-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | add -i: do not dump patch during applicationThomas Rast2009-06-03
|/ | | | | | | | Remove a debugging print that snuck in at 7a26e65 (Revert "git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing", 2009-05-16). Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Revert "git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing"Junio C Hamano2009-05-16
| | | | | | | | This reverts commit 0beee4c6dec15292415e3d56075c16a76a22af54 but with a bit of twist, as we have added "edit hunk manually" hack and we cannot rely on the original line numbers of the hunks that were manually edited. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'mm/maint-add-p-quit'Junio C Hamano2009-04-20
|\ | | | | | | | | * mm/maint-add-p-quit: git add -p: add missing "q" to patch prompt
| * git add -p: add missing "q" to patch promptWincent Colaiuta2009-04-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit cbd3a01 added a new "q" subcommand to the "git add -p" command loop, but forgot to add it to the prompt. Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handlingJeff King2009-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The original implementation considered the mode separately from the rest of the hunks, asking about it outside the main hunk-selection loop. This patch instead places a mode change as the first hunk in the loop. This has two advantages: 1. less duplicated code (since we use the main selection loop). This also cleans up an inconsistency, which is that the main selection loop separates options with a comma, whereas the mode prompt used slashes. 2. users can now skip the mode change and come back to it, search for it (via "/mode"), etc, as they can with other hunks. To facilitate this, each hunk is now marked with a "type". Mode hunks are not considered for splitting (which would make no sense, and also confuses the split_hunk function), nor are they editable. In theory, one could edit the mode lines and change to a new mode. In practice, there are only two modes that git cares about (0644 and 0755), so either you want to move from one to the other or not (and you can do that by staging or not staging). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * git add -p: new "quit" command at the prompt.Matthieu Moy2009-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There's already 'd' to stop staging hunks in a file, but no explicit command to stop the interactive staging (for the current files and the remaining ones). Of course you can do 'd' and then ^C, but it would be more intuitive to allow 'quit' action. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handlingJeff King2009-04-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The original implementation considered the mode separately from the rest of the hunks, asking about it outside the main hunk-selection loop. This patch instead places a mode change as the first hunk in the loop. This has two advantages: 1. less duplicated code (since we use the main selection loop). This also cleans up an inconsistency, which is that the main selection loop separates options with a comma, whereas the mode prompt used slashes. 2. users can now skip the mode change and come back to it, search for it (via "/mode"), etc, as they can with other hunks. To facilitate this, each hunk is now marked with a "type". Mode hunks are not considered for splitting (which would make no sense, and also confuses the split_hunk function), nor are they editable. In theory, one could edit the mode lines and change to a new mode. In practice, there are only two modes that git cares about (0644 and 0755), so either you want to move from one to the other or not (and you can do that by staging or not staging). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | git add -p: new "quit" command at the prompt.Matthieu Moy2009-04-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There's already 'd' to stop staging hunks in a file, but no explicit command to stop the interactive staging (for the current files and the remaining ones). Of course you can do 'd' and then ^C, but it would be more intuitive to allow 'quit' action. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'jc/add-p-unquote'Junio C Hamano2009-03-05
|\ \ | |/ | | | | | | * jc/add-p-unquote: git-add -i/-p: learn to unwrap C-quoted paths
| * git-add -i/-p: learn to unwrap C-quoted pathsJunio C Hamano2009-02-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The underlying plumbing commands are not run with -z option, so the paths returned from them need to be unquoted as needed. Remove the now stale BUGS section from git-add documentaiton as suggested by Teemu Likonen. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | add -i: revisit hunk on editor failureDeskin Miller2009-02-11
|/ | | | | | | | | Similar to the behaviour for editing a commit message, let terminating the editor with a failure abort the current hunk edit and revisit the option selection for the hunk. Signed-off-by: Deskin Miller <deskinm@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* add -p: get rid of Git.pm warnings about unitialized valuesStephan Beyer2009-02-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | After invoking git add -p I always got the warnings: Use of uninitialized value $_[3] in exec at Git.pm line 1282. Use of uninitialized value $args[2] in join or string at Git.pm line 1264. A bisect showed that these warnings occur in a301973 "add -p: print errors in separate color" the first time. They can be reproduced by setting color.ui (or color.interactive) to "auto" and unsetting color.interactive.help and color.interactive.error. I am using Perl 5.10.0. The reason of the warning is that color.interactive.error defaults to color.interactive.help which defaults to nothing in the specific codepath. It defaults to 'red bold' some lines above which could lead to the wrong assumption that it always defaults to 'red bold' now. This patch lets it default to 'red bold', blowing the warnings away. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Acked-By: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* add -p: import Term::ReadKey with 'require'Thomas Rast2009-02-07
| | | | | | | | | eval{use...} is no good because the 'use' is evaluated at compile time, so manually 'require' it. We need to forward declare the functions we use, otherwise Perl raises a compilation error. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* add -p: print errors in separate colorThomas Rast2009-02-05
| | | | | | | | Print interaction error messages in color.interactive.error, which defaults to the value of color.interactive.help. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* add -p: prompt for single charactersThomas Rast2009-02-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Use Term::ReadKey, if available and enabled with interactive.singlekey, to let the user answer add -p's prompts by pressing a single key. We're not doing the same in the main 'add -i' interface because file selection etc. may expect several characters. Two commands take an argument: 'g' can easily cope since it'll just offer a choice of chunks. '/' now (unconditionally, even without readkey) offers a chance to enter a regex if none was given. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* add -p: trap Ctrl-D in 'goto' modeThomas Rast2009-02-04
| | | | | | | | | If the user hit Ctrl-D (EOF) while the script was in 'go to hunk?' mode, it threw an undefined variable error. Explicitly test for EOF and have it re-enter the goto prompt loop. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* add -p: change prompt separator for 'g'Thomas Rast2009-02-04
| | | | | | | | | 57886bc (git-add -i/-p: Change prompt separater from slash to comma, 2008-11-27) changed the prompt separator to ',', but forgot to adapt the 'g' (goto) command. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* In add --patch, Handle K,k,J,j slightly more gracefully.William Pursell2009-02-01
| | | | | | | | Instead of printing the help menu, this will print "No next hunk" and then process the given hunk again. Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Add / command in add --patchWilliam Pursell2009-02-01
| | | | | | | | This command allows the user to skip hunks that don't match the specified regex. Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* git-add -i/-p: Change prompt separater from slash to commaWilliam Pursell2009-02-01
| | | | | | | Otherwise the find command '/' soon to be introduced will be hard to see. Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Add 'g' command to go to a hunkWilliam Pursell2008-12-04
| | | | | | | | | | When a minor change is made while the working directory is in a bit of a mess, it is somewhat difficult to wade through all of the hunks using git add --patch. This allows one to jump to the hunk that needs to be staged without having to respond 'n' to each preceding hunk. Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Add subroutine to display one-line summary of hunksWilliam Pursell2008-12-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | This commit implements a rather simple-minded mechanism to display a one-line summary of the hunks in an array ref. The display consists of the line numbers and the first changed line, truncated to 80 characters. 20 lines are displayed at a time, and the index of the first undisplayed line is returned, allowing the caller to display more if desired. (The 20 and 80 should be made configurable.) Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* add -p: warn if only binary changes presentThomas Rast2008-10-26
| | | | | | | | | | Current 'git add -p' will say "No changes." if there are no changes to text files, which can be confusing if there _are_ changes to binary files. Add some code to distinguish the two cases, and give a different message in the latter one. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'sp/win'Junio C Hamano2008-07-15
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | * sp/win: We need to check for msys as well as Windows in add--interactive. Convert CR/LF to LF in tag signatures Fixed text file auto-detection: treat EOF character 032 at the end of file as printable
| * We need to check for msys as well as Windows in add--interactive.Mike Pape2008-07-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Mike Pape <dotzenlabs@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Make git-add -i accept ranges like 7-Ciaran McCreesh2008-07-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git-add -i ranges expect number-number. But for the supremely lazy, typing in that second number when selecting "from patch 7 to the end" is wasted effort. So treat an empty second number in a range as "until the last item". Signed-off-by: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>