aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-gui
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Merge git://repo.or.cz/git-gui into maintJunio C Hamano2007-02-24
|\ | | | | | | | | * git://repo.or.cz/git-gui: Don't modify CREDITS-FILE if it hasn't changed.
* \ Merge branch 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui into maintJunio C Hamano2007-02-21
|\ \ | |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui: git-gui: Don't crash in citool mode on initial commit. git-gui: Remove TODO list. git-gui: Include browser in our usage message. git-gui: Change summary of git-gui. git-gui: Display all authors of git-gui. git-gui: Use mixed path for docs on Cygwin. git-gui: Correct crash when saving options in blame mode. git-gui: Expose the browser as a subcommand. git-gui: Create new branches from a tag. git-gui: Prefer version file over git-describe. git-gui: Print version on the console. git-gui: More consistently display the application name. git-gui: Permit merging tags into the current branch. git-gui: Basic version check to ensure git 1.5.0 or later is used. git-gui: Refactor 'exec git subcmd' idiom.
* | Merge branch 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-guiJunio C Hamano2007-02-13
|\ \ | |/ | | | | | | * 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui: git-gui: fix typo in GIT-VERSION-GEN, "/dev/null" not "/devnull"
* | Merge branch 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-guiJunio C Hamano2007-02-12
|\ \ | |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui: git-gui: Change base version to 0.6. git-gui: Guess our version accurately as a subproject. git-gui: Handle gitgui tags in version gen. git-gui: Generate a version file on demand. git-gui: Rename GIT_VERSION to GITGUI_VERSION. git-gui: Allow gitexecdir, INSTALL to be set by the caller.
* | Merge git-guiJunio C Hamano2007-02-11
|/ | | | | | | | | | This merges git-gui project of Shawn as a subproject of git.git at git-gui/ subdirectory. This merge only melds two histories together. The toplevel Makefile does not even know about git-gui yet. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* git-gui: Modified makefile to embed version into git-gui script.Shawn O. Pearce2007-01-21
| | | | | | | | | | We want to embed the version of git-gui directly into the script file, so that we can display it properly in the about dialog. Consequently I've refactored the Makefile process to act like the one in core git.git with regards to shell scripts, allowing git-gui to be constructed by a sed replacement performed on git-gui.sh. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Hide the ugly bash command line from the windows desktop icon.Shawn O. Pearce2007-01-21
| | | | | | | | | | The user really doesn't need to see the technical details of how we launch git-gui from within their "desktop icon". Instead we should hide the command line from being displayed when the icon launches by putting @ at the start of the line. If they really need to see the command we are running they can edit the batch file. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Change more 'include' language to 'add'.Shawn O. Pearce2007-01-21
| | | | | | | | | I just found a whole slew of places where we still were using the term 'include' rather than 'add' to refer to the act of updating the index with modifications from the working directory. To be consistent with all Git documentation and command line tools, these should be 'add'. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Work around odd cygpath bug on Windows.Shawn O. Pearce2007-01-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There appears to be a bug on one of my test systems where cygpath with the --long-name option is generating a corrupt string that does not actually refer to sh.exe. This breaks any desktop icon created by git-gui as the executable we are trying to invoke does not exist. Since Cygwin is typically installed as C:\cygwin long path names is probably not actually necessary to link to the shell. I also added a small echo to the start of the icon script, as it can take one of my test systems several seconds to startup git-gui. This way the user knows we're starting git-gui, and was politely asked to wait for the action to complete. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Correct wording of the revert confirmation dialog.Shawn O. Pearce2007-01-21
| | | | | | | | | We no longer describe updating the index as including changes, as we now use the add notation used by core Git's command line tools. So its confusing to be talking about unincluded changes within the revert dialog. Instead we should used language like 'unadded changes'. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Corrected behavior of deleted (but existing in HEAD) files.Shawn O. Pearce2007-01-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Apparently I did not account for the D_ file state. This can occur when a file has been marked for deletion by deleting it from the index, and the file also does not exist in the working directory. Typically this happens when the user deletes the file, hits Rescan, then includes the missing file in the commit, then hits Rescan again. We don't find the file in the working directory but its been removed in the index, so the state becomes D_. This state should be identical with DD. I'm not entirely sure why DD occurs sometimes and D_ others, it would seem like D_ is the state that should be happening instead of DD, leading me to believe there is a quirk in git-gui's state manipulation code. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Run git-gc rather than git-repack.Shawn O. Pearce2007-01-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that git 1.5.0-rc1 and later has a 'git gc' command which performs all important repository management activites (including reflog pruning, repacking local objects, unnecessary loose object pruning and rerere cache expiration) we should run 'gc' when the user wants us to cleanup their object database for them. I think the name 'gc' is horrible for a GUI application like git-gui, so I'm labeling the menu action 'Compress Database' instead. Hopefully this will provide some clue to the user about what the action does. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Show all fetched branches for remote pulls.Shawn O. Pearce2007-01-21
| | | | | | | | | Loop through every remote.<name>.fetch entry and add it as a valid option in the Pull menu. This way users can pull any remote branch that they track, without needing to leave the gui. Its a rather crude work around for not having a full merge interface. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Created very crude Tools menu, to support miga.Shawn O. Pearce2007-01-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | In one particular case I have a tool called 'miga' which users may need to invoke on their repository. This is a homegrown tool which is not (and should be) part of git-gui, but I still want to be able to run it from within the gui. Right now I'm taking a shortcut and adding it to the Tools menu if we are not on Mac OS X and the support script used to launch the tool exists in the local filesystem. This is nothing but a complete and utter hack. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Reworded 'Include' to 'Add' to match core Git.Shawn O. Pearce2007-01-21
| | | | | | | | | Now that git-add is a first class citizen in core Git (Nico's 366bfcb6) users may start to expect the term 'add' to refer to the act of including a file's changes into a commit. So I'm replacing all uses of the term 'Include' in the UI with 'Add'. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Auto-update any A? or M? files during rescan.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-27
| | | | | | | | | | If the user has partial includes disabled then it doesn't matter what state the working directory is in; if the file has been included in the next commit its index state is A or M and we should immediately run update-index on the working directory file to bring the index in sync with the working directory. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Enable resolution of merge conflicts.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | If a file has a merge conflict (index state = U) the user will need to run update-index on that file to resolve all stages down to stage 0, by including the file in the working directory. Like core Git we'll just trust the user that their resolution is correct, and that they didn't just include the file into the commit while merge conflicts still exist within the file. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Set a proper title on our revert confirm dialog box.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-25
| | | | Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Started implementation of switch_branch.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-25
| | | | | | | This implementation of switch_branch is not yet finished, and thus it throws a "NOT FINISHED" error rather than completing the switch. But its a rough sketch of the procedure required. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Misc. comment and formatting cleanups.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-25
| | | Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Rename all_branches -> all_heads.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-25
| | | | | | | | Since this list is really the set of refs which match "refs/heads/*" it really is the set of heads and not necessarily the set of all branches, as the remote tracking branches are not listed in this set, even if it appears in the "refs/heads/*" namespace (e.g. an old style repository). Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Automatically skip tracking branches in branch menu.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-25
| | | | | | | Since the user should not work on a tracking branch we automatically hide any branch which is used as a tracking branch by either a remote.<name>.fetch config entry or by a Pull: line in a remotes file. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Abort on not implemented branch switching.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-25
| | | | | | I'm not currently ready to implement branch switching, so I'm just going to punt on it for now. :-) Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Parse off refs/remotes when showing current branch.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-25
| | | | | | Even though the user shouldn't have a remote branch checked out, if they do we should still show as short of the branch name as possible. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Created Branch menu.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-24
| | | | | | | | This is an early start at branch management from within git-gui. The branch menu has create/delete command entries to create and delete branches as well as a list of radiobutton entries for each branch found in the repository through for-each-ref. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Support file state MD (modified/deleted).Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-24
| | | | | | | | Apparently I missed the file state MD, which is a file modified and updated in the index but then removed from the working directory. This should be treated just like AD, an added file which has been deleted from the working directory. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Display the current branch.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-24
| | | | | | Users want to know what branch they are sitting on before making a commit, as they may need to switch to a different branch first. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Added revert changes command.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-23
| | | | | | | | | Users sometimes need to be able to throw away locally modified files in order to go back to the last committed version of that file. To perform a revert the user must first uninclude each file from the new commit as the working file must at least partially match the index, and we use git-checkout-index to update the working directory. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Improve pull error dialogs.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-22
| | | | | | | Just like prior to a commit its only an informational message that we refuse to perform a pull on a dirty working directory. Therefore we should not use an error icon. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Don't start 'gitk --all' on Mac OS X.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | | Since gitk is currently broken on Mac OS X and is unable to start itself when given command line parameters just don't offer the "Visual All Branches" menu option on Mac OS X. Once this feature of gitk is fixed we should change this section of code to make sure a working version of gitk will be executed before we offer the option up to the user. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Added menu command to visualize all branches.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sometimes its useful to start gitk with the --all option, to view all of the known branches and tags within this repository. Rather than making the user startup gitk and then edit the view we can pass the option along for them. This also makes it slightly more explicit, that when gitk starts up by default its showing the current branch and not everything. Yes gitk isn't showing that to the user, but the fact that the user had to make a decision between seeing this current branch or all branches will hopefully make them study gitk's display before jumping to a conclusion. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Refactor M1 binding selection.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Warn Cygwin users about possible environment issues.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Because the Tcl binary distributed with Cygwin tends to not pass along its own environment (the env array) to its children, its unlikely that any Git commands spawned by git-gui will receive the same environment variables that git-gui itself received from the shell which started it. If the user is counting on environment variables to pass down, like say GIT_INDEX_FILE, they may not, so we warn them during git-gui startup that things may not work out as the user intended. Perhaps one day when git-gui and git are running on native Windows (rather than through the Cygwin emulation layers) things will work better. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Correct is_MacOSX platform test.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | Darwn based UNIX systems are not necessarily Mac OS X. However the only windowing system used by Tk that is Mac OS X is 'aqua', and only 'aqua' exists on Mac OS X. Therefore this is a more reliable test for the Macintosh platform. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Abstract out windows platform test to is_Windows proc.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | Like the is_MacOSX proc we shouldn't keep repeating the platform test for Windows. Instead abstract the code out into a procedure and use the procedure whenever we need to do something special. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Include the Tcl/Tk version in the about dialog.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Users may need to know what version of Tcl they are running git-gui under, in case there is an interesting interface quirk or other compatability problem we don't know about right now that we may need to explore (and maybe fix). Since its simple enough to show a line with this version data we should do so. We also try to reduce the amount of text shown as often the Tcl and Tk version numbers will be identical; when this happens we should only show the one version number. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Make the copyright notice serve double duty.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | The copyright notice we display in the about dialog should be the same as the one at the top of our source code. By putting the copyright notice that appears at the top of our source code into a global variable rather than a comment we can trivially make them the same at all times. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Be more Macintosh like.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | It is tradition for applications to store their about and preferences menu options within the application menu. This is the first menu in the menu bar, just after the apple menu. Apparently the way to access this menu from Tk on Mac OS X systems is to create a special menu whose name ends in ".apple" and place it into the menu bar. So now if we are on Mac OS X we move our about menu and our options menu into the application menu, like other Mac OS X applications. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Added about dialog box.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | | Created a help menu with an about dialog box. This about dialog shows the copyright notice for the application, the fact that it is covered by the GPL v2.0 or later, the authors, and the current version of Git it is invoking when users perform actions within it. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Rename Project menu to Repository.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | Since all of the actions in our Project menu actually apply to the Git concept of a repository, it is a disservice to our users to call it "project". This is especially true if Git ever gets any sort of subproject support, as the term would then most definately conflict. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Seperate out the database operations in project menu.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | The project menu is just too cluttered without using separator entries to split out the database operations (such as repack and verify) from the other options in the same menu. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Reworded verify console title.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | It would be something of a disservice to our users if we refer to fsck-objects as "verify". So instead we call it fsck-objects in the console title, and indicate that's how we are verifying the object database. We probably should call our menu option "fsck-objects" or similar but I really do think that "Verify Database" more accurately describes the action then "fsck-objects" does, especially to users who aren't file system developers. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Don't save amended commit message buffer.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | Because we don't automatically restart in amend mode when we quit while in amend mode the commit message buffer shouldn't be saved to GITGUI_MSG as it would be misleading when the user restarts the application. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Allow users to run fsck-objects from the gui.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I recently found a need to run fsck-objects in a number of repositories that I also use git-gui against. Tossing in a menu option to invoke fsck-objects and have its output show up in a console window is simple enough to do. We probably need to enhance the console window used by fsck-objects, like to open up the Git fsck-objects manual page and let the user see what each message means (such as "dangling commit") and to also let the user invoke prune, to cleanup any such dangling objects. But right now I'm going to ignore that problem in favor of getting other more important features implemented. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Improve handling of merge commits.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Its useful to be able to amend the last commit even if it was a merge commit, so we really should support that in the gui. We now do so by making PARENT a list. We always diff against the first parent but we create a commit consisting of the parent(s) listed in this list, in order. We also should recheck the repository state during an amend. Earlier I was bitten by this exact bug when I switched branches through a command prompt and then did not do a rescan in git-gui. When I hit "Amend Last Commit" I was surprised to see information from the prior branch appear. This was due to git-gui caching the data from the last rescan and using that data form the amend data load request, rather than the data of the current branch. Improved error text in the dialogs used to tell the user why an amend is being refused by git-gui. In general this is only during an initial commit (nothing prior to amend) and during a merge commit (it is simply too confusing to amend the last commit while also trying to complete a merge). Fixed a couple of minor bugs in the pull logic. Since this code isn't really useful nobody has recently tested it and noticed the breakage. It really needs to be rewritten anyway. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Correct some state matchings for include/remove.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-19
| | | Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Update in memory states after commit.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-19
| | | | | | | | | | In order to allow the user to toggle include/exclude from next commit for files which were partially included in the last commit we need the current index mode+sha1 data stored in our file_states array. For any partially included file we have this information from diff-files, so we just have to copy it over to the diff-index portion of our state array. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Restore the all important shebang line.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-19
| | | | | | Accidentally removed by an unnoticed fat finger accident in vi during commit 1461c5f3. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Refactored diff line display formatting logic.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The tags used for diff formatting (which I inherited from gitool) just didn't make a whole lot of sense, especially if you wanted to try to match them to the diff output you were seeing on screen. It did not help that the diff-index -c output's first two columns are also munged to make the diff output more user friendly. So this is a large refactoring of the tags used for diff display. Now our tag names match what we put in the left column of each line, which makes it easier to correlate presentation and implementation. I removed bold font usage from everything except the hunk headers as I really did not like the way bold font caused column alignments to become out of whack within the diff viewer. It also drew attention to the parts of the file which were identically changed in both the index and in the working directory, yet these are usually the parts I find myself caring the least about. So its very counter-intuitive. Lines which are changed differently by both the index and the working directory are now shown with background colors which span the entire line, making these lines easier to pick out of the diff. In general these are the lines that appear to be more interesting to me when looking at the 3-way diff as they are the ones which contain recent and quite different changes. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* git-gui: Correct toggling of added/untracked status for new files.Shawn O. Pearce2006-11-19
| | | | | | | | | New files also lack index data from diff-files therefore we cannot use their diff-files index data when we update-index. Instead we can use the fact that Git has them hardcoded as "0 0{40}" and do the same thing ourselves. This way you can toggle an untracked file into added status and back out to untracked. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>