aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-pull.sh
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Make git-{pull,rebase} message without tracking information friendlierCarlos Martín Nieto2012-03-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current message is too long and at too low a level for anybody to understand it if they don't know about the configuration format already. The text about setting up a remote is superfluous and doesn't help understand or recover from the error that has happened. Show the usage more prominently and explain how to set up the tracking information. If there is only one remote, that name is used instead of the generic <remote>. Also simplify the message we print on detached HEAD to remove unnecessary information which is better left for the documentation. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* "git pull" doesn't know "--edit"Linus Torvalds2012-02-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ok, so now "git merge" defaults to editing when interactive - lovely. But when testing that, I noticed that while you can say git merge --[no-]edit ..branch.. that does not work with "git pull". You get a message like error: unknown option `no-edit' usage: git fetch [<options>] [<repository> [<refspec>...]] or: git fetch [<options>] <group> or: git fetch --multiple [<options>] [(<repository> | <group>)...] or: git fetch --all [<options>] -v, --verbose be more verbose -q, --quiet be more quiet --all fetch from all remotes ... which is because that stupid shell script doesn't know about the new flags, and just passes it to "git fetch" instead. Now, I really wanted to just make "git pull" a built-in instead of that nasty shell script, but I'm lazy. So here's the trivial updates to git-pull.sh to at least teach it about -e/--edit/--no-edit. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'ab/pull-rebase-config'Junio C Hamano2011-12-09
|\ | | | | | | | | * ab/pull-rebase-config: pull: introduce a pull.rebase option to enable --rebase
| * pull: introduce a pull.rebase option to enable --rebaseÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2011-11-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently we either need to set branch.<name>.rebase for existing branches if we'd like "git pull" to mean "git pull --rebase", or have the forethought of setting "branch.autosetuprebase" before we create the branch. Introduce a "pull.rebase" option to globally configure "git pull" to mean "git pull --rebase" for any branch. This option will be considered at a lower priority than branch.<name>.rebase, i.e. we could set pull.rebase=true and branch.<name>.rebase=false and the latter configuration option would win. Reviewed-by: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Fernando Vezzosi <buccia@repnz.net> Reviewed-by: Eric Herman <eric@freesa.org> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Liked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'jk/pull-rebase-with-work-tree'Junio C Hamano2011-10-17
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * jk/pull-rebase-with-work-tree: pull,rebase: handle GIT_WORK_TREE better Conflicts: git-pull.sh
| * | pull,rebase: handle GIT_WORK_TREE betterJeff King2011-10-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | You can't currently run git-pull or git-rebase from outside of the work tree, even with GIT_WORK_TREE set, due to an overeager require_work_tree function. Commit e2eb527 documents this problem and provides the infrastructure for a fix, but left it to later commits to audit and update individual scripts. Changing these scripts to use require_work_tree_exists is easy to verify. We immediately call cd_to_toplevel, anyway. Therefore no matter which function we use, the state afterwards is one of: 1. We have a work tree, and we are at the top level. 2. We don't have a work tree, and we have died. The only catch is that we must also make sure no code that ran before the cd_to_toplevel assumed that we were already in the working tree. In this case, we will only have included shell libraries and called set_reflog_action, neither of which care about the current working directory at all. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | use -h for synopsis and --help for manpage consistentlyClemens Buchacher2011-10-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A few scripted Porcelain implementations pretend as if the routine to show their own help messages are triggered upon "git cmd --help", but a command line parser of "git" will hijack such a request and shows the manpage for the cmd subcommand. Leaving the code to handle such input is simply misleading. Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | Merge branch 'js/i18n-scripts'Junio C Hamano2011-08-25
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * js/i18n-scripts: submodule: take advantage of gettextln and eval_gettextln. stash: take advantage of eval_gettextln pull: take advantage of eval_gettextln git-am: take advantage of gettextln and eval_gettextln. gettext: add gettextln, eval_gettextln to encode common idiom
| * | | pull: take advantage of eval_gettextlnJon Seymour2011-08-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | | Merge branch 'oa/pull-reflog'Junio C Hamano2011-08-08
|\ \ \ \ | |/ / / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * oa/pull-reflog: pull: remove extra space from reflog message Conflicts: git-pull.sh
| * | | pull: remove extra space from reflog messageOri Avtalion2011-08-01
| | |/ | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When executing "git pull" with no arguments, the reflog message was: "pull : Fast-forward" Signed-off-by: Ori Avtalion <ori@avtalion.name> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | i18n: git-pull eval_gettext + warning messageÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2011-05-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | i18n: git-pull eval_gettext + die messageÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2011-05-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | i18n: git-pull die messagesÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2011-05-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | i18n: git-pull add git-sh-i18nÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2011-05-21
|/ / | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'mz/rebase'Junio C Hamano2011-04-28
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * mz/rebase: (34 commits) rebase: define options in OPTIONS_SPEC Makefile: do not install sourced rebase scripts rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specified rebase -i: remove unnecessary state rebase-root rebase -i: don't read unused variable preserve_merges git-rebase--am: remove unnecessary --3way option rebase -m: don't print exit code 2 when merge fails rebase -m: remember allow_rerere_autoupdate option rebase: remember strategy and strategy options rebase: remember verbose option rebase: extract code for writing basic state rebase: factor out sub command handling rebase: make -v a tiny bit more verbose rebase -i: align variable names rebase: show consistent conflict resolution hint rebase: extract am code to new source file rebase: extract merge code to new source file rebase: remove $branch as synonym for $orig_head rebase -i: support --stat rebase: factor out call to pre-rebase hook ...
| * | rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specifiedMartin von Zweigbergk2011-02-10
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 'git rebase' without arguments is currently not supported. Make it default to 'git rebase @{upstream}'. That is also what 'git pull [--rebase]' defaults to, so it only makes sense that 'git rebase' defaults to the same thing. Defaulting to @{upstream} will make it possible to run e.g. 'git rebase -i' without arguments, which is probably a quite common use case. It also improves the scenario where you have multiple branches that rebase against a remote-tracking branch, where you currently have to choose between the extra network delay of 'git pull' or the slightly awkward keys to enter 'git rebase @{u}'. The error reporting when no upstream is configured for the current branch or when no branch is checked out is reused from git-pull.sh. A function is extracted into git-parse-remote.sh for this purpose. Helped-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'jl/submodule-fetch-on-demand'Junio C Hamano2011-04-04
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * jl/submodule-fetch-on-demand: fetch/pull: Describe --recurse-submodule restrictions in the BUGS section submodule update: Don't fetch when the submodule commit is already present fetch/pull: Don't recurse into a submodule when commits are already present Submodules: Add 'on-demand' value for the 'fetchRecurseSubmodule' option config: teach the fetch.recurseSubmodules option the 'on-demand' value fetch/pull: Add the 'on-demand' value to the --recurse-submodules option fetch/pull: recurse into submodules when necessary Conflicts: builtin/fetch.c submodule.c
| * | fetch/pull: Add the 'on-demand' value to the --recurse-submodules optionJens Lehmann2011-03-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Until now the --recurse-submodules option could only be used to either fetch all populated submodules recursively or to disable recursion completely. As fetch and pull now by default just fetch those submodules for which new commits have been fetched in the superproject, a command line option to enforce that behavior is needed to be able to override configuration settings. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | pull: do not clobber untracked files on initial pullJeff King2011-03-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For a pull into an unborn branch, we do not use "git merge" at all. Instead, we call read-tree directly. However, we used the --reset parameter instead of "-m", which turns off the safety features. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | Merge branch 'jk/merge-rename-ux'Junio C Hamano2011-03-19
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * jk/merge-rename-ux: pull: propagate --progress to merge merge: enable progress reporting for rename detection add inexact rename detection progress infrastructure commit: stop setting rename limit bump rename limit defaults (again) merge: improve inexact rename limit warning
| * | pull: propagate --progress to mergeJeff King2011-02-21
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that merge understands progress, we should pass it along. While we're at it, pass along --no-progress, too. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | pull: do not display fetch usage on --help-allMichael J Gruber2011-02-15
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, "git pull --help-all" displays the fetch usage info. Make it equivalent to "git pull -h" instead since "--help-all" is documented in gitcli(7). Do not try to sanitize the pull option parser (aka last hair puller). Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'jl/fetch-submodule-recursive'Junio C Hamano2010-12-16
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * jl/fetch-submodule-recursive: fetch_populated_submodules(): document dynamic allocation Submodules: Add the "fetchRecurseSubmodules" config option Add the 'fetch.recurseSubmodules' config setting fetch/pull: Add the --recurse-submodules option Conflicts: builtin/fetch.c
| * Add the 'fetch.recurseSubmodules' config settingJens Lehmann2010-11-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This new boolean option can be used to override the default for "git fetch" and "git pull", which is to not recurse into populated submodules and fetch all new commits there too. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * fetch/pull: Add the --recurse-submodules optionJens Lehmann2010-11-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Until now you had to call "git submodule update" (without -N|--no-fetch option) or something like "git submodule foreach git fetch" to fetch new commits in populated submodules from their remote. This could lead to "(commits not present)" messages in the output of "git diff --submodule" (which is used by "git gui" and "gitk") after fetching or pulling new commits in the superproject and is an obstacle for implementing recursive checkout of submodules. Also "git submodule update" cannot fetch changes when disconnected, so it was very easy to forget to fetch the submodule changes before disconnecting only to discover later that they are needed. This patch adds the "--recurse-submodules" option to recursively fetch each populated submodule from the url configured in the .git/config of the submodule at the end of each "git fetch" or during "git pull" in the superproject. The submodule paths are taken from the index. The hidden option "--submodule-prefix" is added to "git fetch" to be able to print out the full paths of nested submodules. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Porcelain scripts: Rewrite cryptic "needs update" error messageRamkumar Ramachandra2010-10-28
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | Although Git interally has the facility to differentiate between porcelain and plubmbing commands and appropriately print errors, several shell scripts invoke plubming commands triggering cryptic plumbing errors to be displayed on a porcelain interface. This patch replaces the "needs update" message in git-pull and git-rebase, when `git update-index` is run, with a more friendly message. Reported-by: Joshua Jensen <jjensen@workspacewhiz.com> Reported-by: Thore Husfeldt <thore.husfeldt@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'en/rebase-against-rebase-fix'Junio C Hamano2010-08-21
|\ | | | | | | | | | | * en/rebase-against-rebase-fix: pull --rebase: Avoid spurious conflicts and reapplying unnecessary patches t5520-pull: Add testcases showing spurious conflicts from git pull --rebase
| * pull --rebase: Avoid spurious conflicts and reapplying unnecessary patchesElijah Newren2010-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Prior to c85c792 (pull --rebase: be cleverer with rebased upstream branches, 2008-01-26), pull --rebase would run git rebase $merge_head which resulted in a call to git format-patch ... --ignore-if-in-upstream $merge_head..$cur_branch This resulted in patches from $merge_head..$cur_branch being applied, as long as they did not already exist in $cur_branch..$merge_head. Unfortunately, when upstream is rebased, $merge_head..$cur_branch also refers to "old" commits that have already been rebased upstream, meaning that many patches that were already fixed upstream would be reapplied. This could result in many spurious conflicts, as well as reintroduce patches that were intentionally dropped upstream. So the algorithm was changed in c85c792 (pull --rebase: be cleverer with rebased upstream branches, 2008-01-26) and d44e712 (pull: support rebased upstream + fetch + pull --rebase, 2009-07-19). Defining $old_remote_ref to be the most recent entry in the reflog for @{upstream} that is an ancestor of $cur_branch, pull --rebase was changed to run git rebase --onto $merge_head $old_remote_ref which results in a call to git format-patch ... --ignore-if-in-upstream $old_remote_ref..$cur_branch The whole point of this change was to reduce the number of commits being reapplied, by avoiding commits that upstream already has or had. In the rebased upstream case, this change achieved that purpose. It is worth noting, though, that since $old_remote_ref is always an ancestor of $cur_branch (by its definition), format-patch will not know what upstream is and thus will not be able to determine if any patches are already upstream; they will all be reapplied. In the non-rebased upstream case, this new form is usually the same as the original code but in some cases $old_remote_ref can be an ancestor of $(git merge-base $merge_head $cur_branch) meaning that instead of avoiding reapplying commits that upstream already has, it actually includes more such commits. Combined with the fact that format-patch can no longer detect commits that are already upstream (since it is no longer told what upstream is), results in lots of confusion for users (e.g. "git is giving me lots of conflicts in stuff I didn't even change since my last push.") Cases where additional commits could be reapplied include forking from a commit other than the tracking branch, or amending/rebasing after pushing. Cases where the inability to detect upstreamed commits cause problems include independent discovery of a fix and having your patches get upstreamed by some alternative route (e.g. pulling your changes to a third machine, pushing from there, and then going back to your original machine and trying to pull --rebase). Fix the non-rebased upstream case by ignoring $old_remote_ref whenever it is contained in $(git merge-base $merge_head $cur_branch). This should have no affect on the rebased upstream case. Acked-by: Santi Béjar <santi@agolina.net> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | pull: do nothing on --dry-runJeff King2010-05-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pull was never meant to take --dry-run at all. However, it passes unknown arguments to git-fetch, which does do a dry-run. Unfortunately, pull then attempts to merge whatever cruft was in FETCH_HEAD (which the dry-run fetch will not have written to). Even though we never advertise --dry-run as something that should work, it is still worth being defensive because: 1. Other commands (including fetch) take --dry-run, so a user might try it. 2. Rather than simply producing an error, it actually changes the repository in totally unexpected ways. This patch makes "pull --dry-run" equivalent to "fetch --dry-run". Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'maint'Junio C Hamano2010-03-20
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * maint: Update draft release notes to 1.7.0.3 fetch: Fix minor memory leak fetch: Future-proof initialization of a refspec on stack fetch: Check for a "^{}" suffix with suffixcmp() daemon: parse_host_and_port SIGSEGV if port is specified Makefile: Fix CDPATH problem pull: replace unnecessary sed invocation
| * | pull: replace unnecessary sed invocationStephen Boyd2010-03-20
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Getting the shortened branch name is as easy as using the shell's parameter expansion. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | fetch and pull: learn --progressTay Ray Chuan2010-02-24
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | Note that in the documentation for git-pull, documentation for the --progress option is displayed under the "Options related to fetching" subtitle via fetch-options.txt. Also, update the documentation of the -q/--quiet option for git-pull to mention its effect on progress reporting during fetching. Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* pull: re-fix command line generationJunio C Hamano2010-01-24
| | | | | | | 14e5d40 (pull: Fix parsing of -X<option>, 2010-01-17) forgot that merge_name needs to stay as a single non-interpolated string. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'ap/merge-backend-opts'Junio C Hamano2010-01-20
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * ap/merge-backend-opts: Document that merge strategies can now take their own options Extend merge-subtree tests to test -Xsubtree=dir. Make "subtree" part more orthogonal to the rest of merge-recursive. pull: Fix parsing of -X<option> Teach git-pull to pass -X<option> to git-merge git merge -X<option> git-merge-file --ours, --theirs Conflicts: git-compat-util.h
| * pull: Fix parsing of -X<option>Junio C Hamano2010-01-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | As -X parameter can contain arbitrary $IFS characters, we need to properly quote it from the shell while forming the command line. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * Teach git-pull to pass -X<option> to git-mergeAvery Pennarun2010-01-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This needs the usual sq then eval trick to allow IFS characters in the option. Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Be more user-friendly when refusing to do something because of conflict.Matthieu Moy2010-01-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Various commands refuse to run in the presence of conflicts (commit, merge, pull, cherry-pick/revert). They all used to provide rough, and inconsistant error messages. A new variable advice.resolveconflict is introduced, and allows more verbose messages, pointing the user to the appropriate solution. For commit, the error message used to look like this: $ git commit foo.txt: needs merge foo.txt: unmerged (c34a92682e0394bc0d6f4d4a67a8e2d32395c169) foo.txt: unmerged (3afcd75de8de0bb5076942fcb17446be50451030) foo.txt: unmerged (c9785d77b76dfe4fb038bf927ee518f6ae45ede4) error: Error building trees The "need merge" line is given by refresh_cache. We add the IN_PORCELAIN option to make the output more consistant with the other porcelain commands, and catch the error in return, to stop with a clean error message. The next lines were displayed by a call to cache_tree_update(), which is not reached anymore if we noticed the conflict. The new output looks like: U foo.txt fatal: 'commit' is not possible because you have unmerged files. Please, fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>' as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit, or use 'git commit -a'. Pull is slightly modified to abort immediately if $GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD exists instead of waiting for merge to complain. The behavior of merge and the test-case are slightly modified to reflect the usual flow: start with conflicts, fix them, and afterwards get rid of MERGE_HEAD, with different error messages at each stage. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'maint'Junio C Hamano2009-12-08
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * maint: add-interactive: fix deletion of non-empty files pull: clarify advice for the unconfigured error case
| * | pull: clarify advice for the unconfigured error caseJan Krüger2009-12-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When pull --rebase fails because it cannot find what branch to merge against, the error message implies we are trying to merge. Say "rebase against" instead of "merge with" to avoid confusion. The configuration suggested to remedy the situation uses a confusing syntax, with variables specified in the dotted form accepted by 'git config' but separated from their values by the '=' delimiter used by config files. Since the user will have to edit this output anyway, it is more helpful to provide a config file snippet to paste into an editor and modify. Signed-off-by: Jan Krüger <jk@jk.gs> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | Revert recent "git merge <msg> HEAD <commit>..." deprecationJunio C Hamano2009-12-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit c0ecb07048ce2123589a2f077d296e8cf29a9570 "git-pull.sh: Fix call to git-merge for new command format" and commit b81e00a965c62ca72a4b9db425ee173de147808d "git-merge: a deprecation notice of the ancient command line syntax". They caused a "git pull" (without any arguments, and without any local commits---only to update to the other side) to warn that commit log message is ignored because the merge resulted in a fast-forward. Another possible solution is to add an extra option to "git merge" so that "git pull" can tell it that the message given is not coming from the end user (the canned message is passed just in case the merge resulted in a non-ff and caused commit), but I think it is easier _not_ to deprecate the old syntax. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | git-pull.sh: Fix call to git-merge for new command formatHorst H. von Brand2009-12-02
| |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | Now "git merge <msg> HEAD" is officially deprecated, we should clean our own use as well. Signed-off-by: Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'fc/doc-fast-forward'Junio C Hamano2009-11-15
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * fc/doc-fast-forward: Use 'fast-forward' all over the place Conflicts: builtin-merge.c
| * | Use 'fast-forward' all over the placeFelipe Contreras2009-10-24
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | It's a compound word. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Teach 'git merge' and 'git pull' the option --ff-onlyBjörn Gustavsson2009-10-30
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For convenience in scripts and aliases, add the option --ff-only to only allow fast-forwards (and up-to-date, despite the name). Disallow combining --ff-only and --no-ff, since they flatly contradict each other. Allow all other options to be combined with --ff-only (i.e. do not add any code to handle them specially), including the following options: * --strategy (one or more): As long as the chosen merge strategy results in up-to-date or fast-forward, the command will succeed. * --squash: I cannot imagine why anyone would want to squash commits only if fast-forward is possible, but I also see no reason why it should not be allowed. * --message: The message will always be ignored, but I see no need to explicitly disallow providing a redundant message. Acknowledgements: I did look at Yuval Kogman's earlier patch (107768 in gmane), mainly as shortcut to find my way in the code, but I did not copy anything directly. Signed-off-by: Björn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* pull: improve advice for unconfigured error caseJeff King2009-10-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are several reasons a git-pull invocation might not have anything marked for merge: 1. We're not on a branch, so there is no branch configuration. 2. We're on a branch, but there is no configuration for this branch. 3. We fetched from the configured remote, but the configured branch to merge didn't get fetched (either it doesn't exist, or wasn't part of the fetch refspec). 4. We fetched from the non-default remote, but didn't specify a branch to merge. We can't use the configured one because it applies to the default remote. 5. We fetched from a specified remote, and a refspec was given, but it ended up not fetching anything (this is actually hard to do; if the refspec points to a remote branch and it doesn't exist, then fetch will fail and we never make it to this code path. But if you provide a wildcard refspec like refs/bogus/*:refs/remotes/origin/* then you can see this failure). We have handled (1) and (2) for some time. Recently, commit a6dbf88 added code to handle case (3). This patch handles cases (4) and (5), which previously just fell under other cases, producing a confusing message. While we're at it, let's rewrap the text for case (3), which looks terribly ugly as it is. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* git-pull: dead code removalJunio C Hamano2009-10-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Back when a74b170 (git-pull: disallow implicit merging to detached HEAD, 2007-01-15) added this check, $? referred to the error status of reading HEAD as a symbolic-ref; but cd67e4d (Teach 'git pull' about --rebase, 2007-11-28) moved the command away from where the check is, and nobody noticed the breakage. Ever since, $? has always been 0 (tr at the end of the pipe to find merge_head never fails) and other case arms were never reached. These days, error_on_no_merge_candidates function is prepared to handle a detached HEAD case, which was what the code this patch removes used to handle. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* pull: Clarify "helpful" message for another corner casev1.6.5-rc2Junio C Hamano2009-09-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | When the remote branch we asked for merging did not exist in the set of fetched refs, we unconditionally hinted that it was because of lack of configuration. It is not necessarily so, and risks sending users for a wild goose chase. Make sure to check if that is indeed the case before telling a wild guess to the user. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* allow pull --rebase on branch yet to be bornJeff King2009-08-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | When doing a "pull --rebase", we check to make sure that the index and working tree are clean. The index-clean check compares the index against HEAD. The test erroneously reports dirtiness if we don't have a HEAD yet. In such an "unborn branch" case, by definition, a non-empty index won't be based on whatever we are pulling down from the remote, and will lose the local change. Just check if $GIT_DIR/index exists and error out. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* pull: support rebased upstream + fetch + pull --rebaseSanti Béjar2009-07-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | You cannot do a "git pull --rebase" with a rebased upstream, if you have already run "git fetch". Try to behave as if the "git fetch" was not run. In other words, find the fork point of the current branch, where the tip of upstream branch used to be, and use it as the upstream parameter of "git rebase". This patch computes the fork point by walking the reflog to find the first commit which is an ancestor of the current branch. Maybe there are smarter ways to compute it, but this is a straight forward implementation. Signed-off-by: Santi Béjar <santi@agolina.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.1 (git 2.18.0) at 2024-11-05 06:20:35 +0000