| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The only visible change is that git-blame doesn't understand
"--compability" anymore, but it does accept "--compatibility" instead,
which is already documented.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is about 15% faster that the current sha1ppc.S on a G4, and
5% faster on a G5 when hashing 10 million bytes, unaligned.
(The G5 ratio seems to get better as the sizes fall.)
It's also somewhat smaller, due to using load-multiple instructions.
No copyright is claimed on the changes to Paul Mackerras' work below.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The PPC SHA1 routine had an overflow which meant that it gave
incorrect results for input buffers >= 512MB. This fixes it by
ensuring that the update of the total length in bits is done using
64-bit arithmetic.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
|
|
Here is a SHA1 implementation with the core written in PPC assembly.
On my 2GHz G5, it does 218MB/s, compared to 135MB/s for the openssl
version or 45MB/s for the mozilla version.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
