aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t0040-parse-options.sh
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Fix test-parse-options "integer" testJunio C Hamano2008-07-30
| | | | | | | | | | OPT_INTEGER() works on an integer, not on an unsigned long. On a big endian architecture with long larger than int, integer test gives bogus results because of this bug. Reported by H.Merijn Brand in HP-UX 64-bit environment. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* parse-options: fix segmentation fault when a required value is missingOlivier Marin2008-07-21
| | | | | | | | | | p->argc represent the number of arguments that have not been parsed yet, _including_ the one we are currently parsing. If it is not greater than one then there is no more argument. Signed-off-by: Olivier Marin <dkr@freesurf.fr> Acked-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Extend parse-options test suiteStephan Beyer2008-06-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | This patch serves two purposes: 1. test-parse-option.c should be a more complete example for the parse-options API, and 2. there have been no tests for OPT_CALLBACK, OPT_DATE, OPT_BIT, OPT_SET_INT and OPT_SET_PTR before. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index"Junio C Hamano2008-05-24
| | | | | | | | | | | As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* parse-options: new option type to treat an option-like parameter as an argument.Pierre Habouzit2008-03-02
| | | | | | | This is meant to be used to keep --not and --all during revision parsing. Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Sane use of test_expect_failureJunio C Hamano2008-02-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* parse-options: catch likely typo in presense of aggregated options.Pierre Habouzit2008-01-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If options are aggregated, and that the whole token is an exact prefix of a long option that is longer than 2 letters, reject it. This is to prevent a common typo: $ git commit -amend to get interpreted as "commit all with message 'end'". The typo check isn't performed if there is no aggregation, because the stuck form is the recommended one. If we have `-o` being a valid short option that takes an argument, and --option a long one, then we _MUST_ accept -option as "'o' option with argument 'ption'", which is our official recommended form. Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* parse-options: abbreviation engine fix.Johannes Schindelin2007-11-05
| | | | | | | | | | When an option could be an ambiguous abbreviation of two options, the code used to error out. Even if an exact match would have occured later. Test and original patch by Pierre Habouzit. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* parse-options: Allow abbreviated options when unambiguousJohannes Schindelin2007-10-29
| | | | | | | | | When there is an option "--amend", the option parser now recognizes "--am" for that option, provided that there is no other option beginning with "--am". Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* Add tests for parse-options.cJohannes Schindelin2007-10-29
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>