Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | |
---|---|---|---|
* | t1010-mktree: Adjust expected result to code and documentation | Michael J Gruber | 2010-04-17 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The last two tests here were always supposed to fail in the sense that, according to code and documentation, mktree should read non-recursive ls-tree output, but not recursive one, and therefore explicitely refuses to deal with slashes. Adjust the test (must_fail) so that it succeeds when mktree dies on slashes. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | ||
* | mktree --missing: allow missing objects | Junio C Hamano | 2009-05-10 |
| | | | | | | | | | | We need to allow input lines that point at objects that we do not have when dealing with submodule entries anyway. This adds an explicit option to allow missing objects of other types, to be consistent with the use of --info-only option to the update-index command and --missing-ok option to the write-tree command. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | ||
* | t1010: add mktree test | Junio C Hamano | 2009-05-10 |
So far mktree (which has always been a quick hack) had no test. At least give it a bit of test coverage. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> |