aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t1302-repo-version.sh
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* tests: add missing &&Jonathan Nieder2010-11-09
| | | | | | | | | | | Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t1302 (core.repositoryversion): style tweaksJonathan Nieder2010-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This test is from 2007, which is late enough for the style to be recognizably modern but still a while ago. Freshen it up to follow new best practices: - guard setup commands with test_expect_setup, so errors at that stage can be caught; - use <<\EOF in preference to <<EOF, to save reviewers the trouble of looking for variable interpolations; - use test_cmp instead of test "$foo" = "$bar", for better output with -v on failure; - indent commands in subshells and let them span multiple lines; - combine the two "gitdir required mode" tests that do not make as much sense alone. Cc: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tests: subshell indentation stylefixJonathan Nieder2010-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Format the subshells introduced by the previous patch (Several tests: cd inside subshell instead of around, 2010-09-06) like so: ( cd subdir && ... ) && This is generally easier to read and has the nice side-effect that this patch will show what commands are used in the subshell, making it easier to check for lost environment variables and similar behavior changes. Cc: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Several tests: cd inside subshell instead of aroundJens Lehmann2010-09-06
| | | | | | | | | | Fixed all places where it was a straightforward change from cd'ing into a directory and back via "cd .." to a cd inside a subshell. Found these places with "git grep -w "cd \.\.". Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t/: Use "test_must_fail git" instead of "! git"Stephan Beyer2008-07-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git". This is useful to - make sure the test does not fail because of a signal, e.g. SIGSEGV, and - advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Sane use of test_expect_failureJunio C Hamano2008-02-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Do check_repository_format() early (re-fix)Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy2007-12-05
This pushes check_repository_format() (actually _gently() version) to setup_git_directory_gently() in order to prevent from using unsupported repositories. New setup_git_directory_gently()'s behaviour is stop searching for a valid gitdir and return as if there is no gitdir if a unsupported repository is found. Warning will be thrown in these cases. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>