aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* for-each-ref: Fix sort with multiple keysKacper Kornet2012-08-21
| | | | | | | | | | The linked list describing sort options was not correctly set up in opt_parse_sort. In the result, contrary to the documentation, only the last of multiple --sort options to git-for-each-ref was taken into account. This commit fixes it. Signed-off-by: Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t6300: test sort with multiple keysKacper Kornet2012-08-21
| | | | | | | | | | Documentation of git-for-each-ref says that --sort=<key> option can be used multiple times, in which case the last key becomes the primary key. However this functionality was never checked in test suite and is currently broken. This commit adds appropriate test in preparation for fix. Signed-off-by: Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* for-each-ref: add split message parts to %(contents:*).Michał Górny2011-09-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The %(body) placeholder returns the whole body of a tag or commit, including the signature. However, callers may want to get just the body without signature, or just the signature. Rather than change the meaning of %(body), which might break some scripts, this patch introduces a new set of placeholders which break down the %(contents) placeholder into its constituent parts. [jk: initial patch by mg, rebased on top of my refactoring and with tests by me] Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* for-each-ref: handle multiline subjects like --prettyJeff King2011-09-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Generally the format of a git tag or commit message is: subject body body body body body body However, we occasionally see multiline subjects like: subject with multiple lines body body body body body body The rest of git treats these multiline subjects as something to be concatenated and shown as a single line (e.g., "git log --pretty=format:%s" will do so since f53bd74). For consistency, for-each-ref should do the same with its "%(subject)". Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t6300: add more body-parsing testsJeff King2011-09-08
| | | | | | | | | The current tests don't actually check parsing commit and tag messages that have both a subject and a body (they just have single-line messages). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* for-each-ref: Field with abbreviated objectnameMichael J Gruber2010-05-18
| | | | | | | | | Introduce a :short modifier to objectname which outputs the abbreviated object name. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* for-each-ref: utilize core.warnAmbiguousRefs for :short-formatBert Wesarg2009-04-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | core.warnAmbiguousRefs is used to select strict mode for the abbreviation for the ":short" format specifier of "refname" and "upstream". In strict mode, the abbreviated ref will never trigger the 'warn_ambiguous_refs' warning. I.e. for these refs: refs/heads/xyzzy refs/tags/xyzzy the abbreviated forms are: heads/xyzzy tags/xyzzy Signed-off-by: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* for-each-ref: add "upstream" format fieldJeff King2009-04-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The logic for determining the upstream ref of a branch is somewhat complex to perform in a shell script. This patch provides a plumbing mechanism for scripts to access the C logic used internally by git-status, git-branch, etc. For example: $ git for-each-ref \ --format='%(refname:short) %(upstream:short)' \ refs/heads/ master origin/master Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* for-each-ref: `:short` format for `refname`Bert Wesarg2008-09-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tries to shorten the refname to a non-ambiguous name. Szeder Gábor noticed that the git bash completion takes a tremendous amount of time to strip leading components from heads and tags refs (i.e. refs/heads, refs/tags, ...). He proposed a new atom called 'refbasename' which removes at most two leading components from the ref name. I myself, proposed a more dynamic solution, which strips off common leading components with the matched pattern. But the current bash solution and both proposals suffer from one mayor problem: ambiguous refs. A ref is ambiguous, if it resolves to more than one full refs. I.e. given the refs refs/heads/xyzzy and refs/tags/xyzzy. The (short) ref xyzzy can point to both refs. ( Note: Its irrelevant whether the referenced objects are the same or not. ) This proposal solves this by checking for ambiguity of the shorten ref name. The shortening is done with the same rules for resolving refs but in the reverse order. The short name is checked if it resolves to a different ref. To continue the above example, the output would be like this: heads/xyzzy xyzzy So, if you want just tags, xyzzy is not ambiguous, because it will resolve to a tag. If you need the heads you get a also a non-ambiguous short form of the ref. To integrate this new format into the bash completion to get only non-ambiguous refs is beyond the scope of this patch. Signed-off-by: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t3600 - t6999)Nanako Shiraishi2008-09-03
| | | | | | | Converts tests between t3600-t6300. Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* for-each-ref: cope with tags with incomplete linesJunio C Hamano2008-08-20
| | | | | | | If you have a tag with a single, incomplete line as its payload, asking git-for-each-ref for its %(body) element accessed a NULL pointer. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* improve for-each-ref test scriptJeff King2008-06-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, we did a sanity check by doing for-each-ref using each possible format atom. However, we never checked the actual output produced by that atom, which recently let an obvious bug go undetected for some time. While we're at it, also clean up a few '!' into test_must_fail. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index"Junio C Hamano2008-05-24
| | | | | | | | | | | As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Sane use of test_expect_failureJunio C Hamano2008-02-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* for-each-ref: Fix quoting style constants.Johannes Sixt2007-12-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | for-each-ref can accept only one quoting style. For this reason it uses OPT_BIT for the quoting style switches so that it is easy to check for more than one bit being set. However, not all symbolic constants were actually single bit values. In particular: $ git for-each-ref --python error: more than one quoting style ? This fixes it. While we are here, let's also remove the space before the question mark. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* for-each-ref: fix setup of option-parsing for --sortLars Hjemli2007-11-10
| | | | | | | | The option value for --sort is already a pointer to a pointer to struct ref_sort, so just use it. Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Make builtin-for-each-ref.c use parse-opts.Pierre Habouzit2007-10-29
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* Add a test script for for-each-ref, including test of date formattingAndy Parkins2007-10-03
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>