From 51add76e92c9de9bcad3d421303b45ab488d529e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 16:43:51 +0200
Subject: Retire 'stupid' merge strategy

As pointed out by Linus, this strategy tries to take the best merge
base, but 'recursive' just does it better. If one needs something more
than 'resolve' then he/she should really use 'recursive' and not
'stupid'.

Cf. Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807030947360.18105@woody.linux-foundation.org>

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
 .gitignore | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

(limited to '.gitignore')

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 4ff2fec27..8054d9ddb 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ git-merge-one-file
 git-merge-ours
 git-merge-recursive
 git-merge-resolve
-git-merge-stupid
 git-merge-subtree
 git-mergetool
 git-mktag
-- 
cgit v1.2.1