From 5ccfb758b0e69b77b0ad830cc35d7770b08589eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 19:31:37 -0700 Subject: Update rev-parse flags list. I haven't audited the rev-parse users, but I am having a feeling that many of them would choke when they expect a couple of SHA1 object names and malicious user feeds them "--max-count=6" or somesuch to shoot himself in the foot. Anyway, this adds a couple of missing parameters that affect the list of revs to be returned from rev-list, not the flags that affect how they are presented by rev-list. I think that is the intention, but I am not quite sure. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- rev-parse.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'rev-parse.c') diff --git a/rev-parse.c b/rev-parse.c index 1965e90a8..1c6ae76f9 100644 --- a/rev-parse.c +++ b/rev-parse.c @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ static int is_rev_argument(const char *arg) "--max-age=", "--min-age=", "--merge-order", + "--topo-order", + "--bisect", + "--no-merges", NULL }; const char **p = rev_args; -- cgit v1.2.1