From 6f5f9d747690b91e212c91138ae9efd1bfbfbb7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff King Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:44:50 -0400 Subject: t0005: use test_match_signal as appropriate The first test already uses this more portable construct (that was where it was factored from initially), but the later tests do a raw comparison against 141 to look for SIGPIPE, which can fail on some shells and platforms. Signed-off-by: Jeff King Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- t/t0005-signals.sh | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 't') diff --git a/t/t0005-signals.sh b/t/t0005-signals.sh index 95f8c05eb..46042f1f1 100755 --- a/t/t0005-signals.sh +++ b/t/t0005-signals.sh @@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ test_expect_success 'create blob' ' test_expect_success !MINGW 'a constipated git dies with SIGPIPE' ' OUT=$( ((large_git; echo $? 1>&3) | :) 3>&1 ) && - test "$OUT" -eq 141 + test_match_signal 13 "$OUT" ' test_expect_success !MINGW 'a constipated git dies with SIGPIPE even if parent ignores it' ' OUT=$( ((trap "" PIPE; large_git; echo $? 1>&3) | :) 3>&1 ) && - test "$OUT" -eq 141 + test_match_signal 13 "$OUT" ' test_done -- cgit v1.2.1