From 7d1aaa684d42964b8b287b8c9450184dfd5bce85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:57:57 +0100
Subject: t0060: verify that basename() and dirname() work as expected

Unfortunately, some libgen implementations yield outcomes different
from what Git expects. For example, mingw-w64-crt provides a basename()
function, that shortens `path0/` to `path`!

So let's verify that the basename() and dirname() functions we use
conform to what Git expects.

Derived-from-code-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
 t/t0060-path-utils.sh | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

(limited to 't')

diff --git a/t/t0060-path-utils.sh b/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
index 93605f42f..584a0decf 100755
--- a/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
+++ b/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ case $(uname -s) in
 	;;
 esac
 
+test_expect_success basename 'test-path-utils basename'
+test_expect_success dirname 'test-path-utils dirname'
+
 norm_path "" ""
 norm_path . ""
 norm_path ./ ""
-- 
cgit v1.2.1