From 1eca4365be25c540650693e941bc06a66cf38f94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 20:03:17 +0900 Subject: libata: beef up iterators There currently are the following looping constructs. * __ata_port_for_each_link() for all available links * ata_port_for_each_link() for edge links * ata_link_for_each_dev() for all devices * ata_link_for_each_dev_reverse() for all devices in reverse order Now there's a need for looping construct which is similar to __ata_port_for_each_link() but iterates over PMP links before the host link. Instead of adding another one with long name, do the following cleanup. * Implement and export ata_link_next() and ata_dev_next() which take @mode parameter and can be used to build custom loop. * Implement ata_for_each_link() and ata_for_each_dev() which take looping mode explicitly. The following iteration modes are implemented. * ATA_LITER_EDGE : loop over edge links * ATA_LITER_HOST_FIRST : loop over all links, host link first * ATA_LITER_PMP_FIRST : loop over all links, PMP links first * ATA_DITER_ENABLED : loop over enabled devices * ATA_DITER_ENABLED_REVERSE : loop over enabled devices in reverse order * ATA_DITER_ALL : loop over all devices * ATA_DITER_ALL_REVERSE : loop over all devices in reverse order This change removes exlicit device enabledness checks from many loops and makes it clear which ones are iterated over in which direction. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 19 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c') diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c index c012307d0ba6..ef02e488d468 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void ata_acpi_associate_sata_port(struct ata_port *ap) ap->link.device->acpi_handle = NULL; - ata_port_for_each_link(link, ap) { + ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) { acpi_integer adr = SATA_ADR(ap->port_no, link->pmp); link->device->acpi_handle = @@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ static void ata_acpi_detach_device(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *dev) struct ata_link *tlink; struct ata_device *tdev; - ata_port_for_each_link(tlink, ap) - ata_link_for_each_dev(tdev, tlink) + ata_for_each_link(tlink, ap, EDGE) + ata_for_each_dev(tdev, tlink, ALL) tdev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_DETACH; } @@ -588,12 +588,9 @@ int ata_acpi_cbl_80wire(struct ata_port *ap, const struct ata_acpi_gtm *gtm) { struct ata_device *dev; - ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link) { + ata_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link, ENABLED) { unsigned long xfer_mask, udma_mask; - if (!ata_dev_enabled(dev)) - continue; - xfer_mask = ata_acpi_gtm_xfermask(dev, gtm); ata_unpack_xfermask(xfer_mask, NULL, NULL, &udma_mask); @@ -893,7 +890,7 @@ void ata_acpi_on_resume(struct ata_port *ap) * use values set by _STM. Cache _GTF result and * schedule _GTF. */ - ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link) { + ata_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link, ALL) { ata_acpi_clear_gtf(dev); if (ata_dev_enabled(dev) && ata_dev_get_GTF(dev, NULL) >= 0) @@ -904,7 +901,7 @@ void ata_acpi_on_resume(struct ata_port *ap) * there's no reason to evaluate IDE _GTF early * without _STM. Clear cache and schedule _GTF. */ - ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link) { + ata_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link, ALL) { ata_acpi_clear_gtf(dev); if (ata_dev_enabled(dev)) dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_ACPI_PENDING; @@ -932,8 +929,8 @@ void ata_acpi_set_state(struct ata_port *ap, pm_message_t state) if (state.event == PM_EVENT_ON) acpi_bus_set_power(ap->acpi_handle, ACPI_STATE_D0); - ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link) { - if (dev->acpi_handle && ata_dev_enabled(dev)) + ata_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link, ENABLED) { + if (dev->acpi_handle) acpi_bus_set_power(dev->acpi_handle, state.event == PM_EVENT_ON ? ACPI_STATE_D0 : ACPI_STATE_D3); -- cgit v1.2.1