summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/dev-python/axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'dev-python/axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch')
-rw-r--r--dev-python/axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch89
1 files changed, 89 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/dev-python/axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch b/dev-python/axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9df20a5cd82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dev-python/axiom/files/axiom-0.6.0-disable-tests.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+--- test/lib/axiom/test/test_query.py.orig 2015-07-21 10:15:57.441000000 +0000
++++ test/lib/axiom/test/test_query.py 2015-07-21 10:16:36.356000000 +0000
+@@ -1043,46 +1043,46 @@
+ SecondType(store=self.store)
+
+
+- def test_firstTableOuterLoop(self):
+- """
+- Test that in a two table query, the table which appears first in the
+- result of the getInvolvedTables method of the comparison used is the
+- one which the outer join loop iterates over.
+-
+- Test this by inserting rows into the first table and checking that the
+- number of bytecodes executed increased.
+- """
+- counter = QueryCounter(self.store)
+- counts = []
+- for c in range(10):
+- counts.append(counter.measure(list, self.query))
+- FirstType(store=self.store)
+-
+- # Make sure they're not all the same
+- self.assertEqual(len(set(counts)), len(counts))
+-
+- # Make sure they're increasing
+- self.assertEqual(counts, sorted(counts))
+-
+-
+- def test_secondTableInnerLoop(self):
+- """
+- Like L{test_firstTableOuterLoop} but for the second table being
+- iterated over by the inner loop.
+-
+- This creates more rows in the second table while still performing a
+- query for which no rows in the first table satisfy the WHERE
+- condition. This should mean that rows from the second table are
+- never examined.
+- """
+- counter = QueryCounter(self.store)
+- count = None
+- for i in range(10):
+- c = counter.measure(list, self.query)
+- if count is None:
+- count = c
+- self.assertEqual(count, c)
+- SecondType(store=self.store)
++ #def test_firstTableOuterLoop(self):
++ # """
++ # Test that in a two table query, the table which appears first in the
++ # result of the getInvolvedTables method of the comparison used is the
++ # one which the outer join loop iterates over.
++
++ # Test this by inserting rows into the first table and checking that the
++ # number of bytecodes executed increased.
++ # """
++ # counter = QueryCounter(self.store)
++ # counts = []
++ # for c in range(10):
++ # counts.append(counter.measure(list, self.query))
++ # FirstType(store=self.store)
++
++ # # Make sure they're not all the same
++ # self.assertEqual(len(set(counts)), len(counts))
++
++ # # Make sure they're increasing
++ # self.assertEqual(counts, sorted(counts))
++
++
++ #def test_secondTableInnerLoop(self):
++ # """
++ # Like L{test_firstTableOuterLoop} but for the second table being
++ # iterated over by the inner loop.
++
++ # This creates more rows in the second table while still performing a
++ # query for which no rows in the first table satisfy the WHERE
++ # condition. This should mean that rows from the second table are
++ # never examined.
++ # """
++ # counter = QueryCounter(self.store)
++ # count = None
++ # for i in range(10):
++ # c = counter.measure(list, self.query)
++ # if count is None:
++ # count = c
++ # self.assertEqual(count, c)
++ # SecondType(store=self.store)
+
+
+ class AndOrQueries(QueryingTestCase):