| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Older bashes seem to think:
$(( "26" % 2 ))
Is
$(( ""26" % 2 " ))
Or something, and barfs.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a result of the oversight that PV contains _rc and DIST_VERSION
contains -RC, and this leads to the latter leaking into libpaths
and subslots, where it shouldn't.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is because we don't need to update the patches as often as perl
updates, because the patch set tends to be portable across versions.
This prevents us from needing a new patch tarball simply because we
changed version.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As per discussion on #gentoo-perl, this is slated as a strategy for
5.26, as it means people who upgrade to 5.26 retain existing installed
modules in their @INC
This serves as additional defence against portage build-order issues,
which are going to become especially pertinent given we're going to
have a substantial number of packages likely to fail configure or test.
So its important that people who can't rebuild packages can still have
existing versions continue to work on the newer perl where possible.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64 arm arm64 ppc ppc64"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ppc64"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="x86"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
| |
Gentoo-Bug: 618420
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
RepoMan-Options: --ignore-arches
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Backported fix from mozilla25 to spidermonkey-17 and spidermonkey-24.
Also bumped spidermonkey-24 EAPI to 6.
Bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/601030
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="arm"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gentoo-Bug: 617500
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="arm"
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="arm"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="x86"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit dc69a0114fc0720afca6be5c9538726c42cc56b8.
I was just advised that this is not a good stable candidate; there were
no bugs reported on bugzilla that's why I wasn't aware of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1.8.1 will be coming in a couple of weeks so I'm just stabilizing this on amd64.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ppc64"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
USE=jemalloc was not correctly implemented so jemalloc was
not actually used at all.
Thanks to Kirill in bug 616820 for the bug report and patch.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
RepoMan-Options: --ignore-arches
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/617028
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5_p31, Repoman-2.3.2_p61
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ppc"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
RepoMan-Options: --ignore-arches
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="x86"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
|