aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorElijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>2010-09-08 00:40:41 -0600
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2010-09-09 17:03:02 -0700
commit86273e5764ab7faaa84c3de1a428ed24a6cfdf1f (patch)
tree168f9e9e421bcd609fcadbeadfbf69715ac30278 /t
parent56bfd762e5e602031eab8ce881b8ab0c50d2cfcc (diff)
downloadgit-86273e5764ab7faaa84c3de1a428ed24a6cfdf1f.tar.gz
git-86273e5764ab7faaa84c3de1a428ed24a6cfdf1f.tar.xz
merge-recursive: D/F conflicts where was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir
In merge-recursive.c, whenever there was a rename where a file name on one side of the rename matches a directory name on the other side of the merge, then the very first check that string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst) would trigger forcing it into marking it as a rename/directory conflict. However, if the path is only renamed on one side and a simple three-way merge between the separate files resolves cleanly, then we don't need to mark it as a rename/directory conflict. So, we can simply move the check for rename/directory conflicts after we've verified that there isn't a rename/rename conflict and that a threeway content merge doesn't work. This changes the particular error message one gets in the case where the directory name that a file on one side of the rename matches is not also part of the rename pair. For example, with commits containing the files: COMMON -> (HEAD, MERGE ) --------- --------------- ------- sub/file1 -> (sub/file1, newsub) <NULL> -> (newsub/newfile, <NULL>) then previously when one tried to merge MERGE into HEAD, one would get CONFLICT (rename/directory): Rename sub/file1->newsub in HEAD directory newsub added in merge Renaming sub/file1 to newsub~HEAD instead Adding newsub/newfile Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. After this patch, the error message will instead become: Removing newsub Adding newsub/newfile CONFLICT (file/directory): There is a directory with name newsub in merge. Adding newsub as newsub~HEAD Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. That makes more sense to me, because git can't know that there's a conflict until after it's tried resolving paths involving newsub/newfile to see if they are still in the way at the end (and if newsub/newfile is not in the way at the end, there should be no conflict at all, which did not hold with git previously). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't')
-rwxr-xr-xt/t3509-cherry-pick-merge-df.sh4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/t/t3509-cherry-pick-merge-df.sh b/t/t3509-cherry-pick-merge-df.sh
index eb5826f30..948ca1bce 100755
--- a/t/t3509-cherry-pick-merge-df.sh
+++ b/t/t3509-cherry-pick-merge-df.sh
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick succeeds with was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir (reso
git cherry-pick --strategy=resolve simple
'
-test_expect_failure 'Cherry-pick succeeds with was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir (recursive)' '
+test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick succeeds with was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir (recursive)' '
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -q nick-testcase^0 &&
git cherry-pick --strategy=recursive simple
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick with rename to different D/F conflict succeeds
git cherry-pick --strategy=resolve mergeme
'
-test_expect_failure 'Cherry-pick with rename to different D/F conflict succeeds (recursive)' '
+test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick with rename to different D/F conflict succeeds (recursive)' '
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -q newhead^0 &&
git cherry-pick --strategy=recursive mergeme