diff options
author | Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> | 2010-09-08 00:40:41 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2010-09-09 17:03:02 -0700 |
commit | 86273e5764ab7faaa84c3de1a428ed24a6cfdf1f (patch) | |
tree | 168f9e9e421bcd609fcadbeadfbf69715ac30278 /t | |
parent | 56bfd762e5e602031eab8ce881b8ab0c50d2cfcc (diff) | |
download | git-86273e5764ab7faaa84c3de1a428ed24a6cfdf1f.tar.gz git-86273e5764ab7faaa84c3de1a428ed24a6cfdf1f.tar.xz |
merge-recursive: D/F conflicts where was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir
In merge-recursive.c, whenever there was a rename where a file name on one
side of the rename matches a directory name on the other side of the merge,
then the very first check that
string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst)
would trigger forcing it into marking it as a rename/directory conflict.
However, if the path is only renamed on one side and a simple three-way
merge between the separate files resolves cleanly, then we don't need to
mark it as a rename/directory conflict. So, we can simply move the check
for rename/directory conflicts after we've verified that there isn't a
rename/rename conflict and that a threeway content merge doesn't work.
This changes the particular error message one gets in the case where the
directory name that a file on one side of the rename matches is not also
part of the rename pair. For example, with commits containing the files:
COMMON -> (HEAD, MERGE )
--------- --------------- -------
sub/file1 -> (sub/file1, newsub)
<NULL> -> (newsub/newfile, <NULL>)
then previously when one tried to merge MERGE into HEAD, one would get
CONFLICT (rename/directory): Rename sub/file1->newsub in HEAD directory newsub added in merge
Renaming sub/file1 to newsub~HEAD instead
Adding newsub/newfile
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
After this patch, the error message will instead become:
Removing newsub
Adding newsub/newfile
CONFLICT (file/directory): There is a directory with name newsub in merge. Adding newsub as newsub~HEAD
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
That makes more sense to me, because git can't know that there's a conflict
until after it's tried resolving paths involving newsub/newfile to see if
they are still in the way at the end (and if newsub/newfile is not in the
way at the end, there should be no conflict at all, which did not hold with
git previously).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't')
-rwxr-xr-x | t/t3509-cherry-pick-merge-df.sh | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/t/t3509-cherry-pick-merge-df.sh b/t/t3509-cherry-pick-merge-df.sh index eb5826f30..948ca1bce 100755 --- a/t/t3509-cherry-pick-merge-df.sh +++ b/t/t3509-cherry-pick-merge-df.sh @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick succeeds with was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir (reso git cherry-pick --strategy=resolve simple ' -test_expect_failure 'Cherry-pick succeeds with was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir (recursive)' ' +test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick succeeds with was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir (recursive)' ' git reset --hard && git checkout -q nick-testcase^0 && git cherry-pick --strategy=recursive simple @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick with rename to different D/F conflict succeeds git cherry-pick --strategy=resolve mergeme ' -test_expect_failure 'Cherry-pick with rename to different D/F conflict succeeds (recursive)' ' +test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick with rename to different D/F conflict succeeds (recursive)' ' git reset --hard && git checkout -q newhead^0 && git cherry-pick --strategy=recursive mergeme |