diff options
| author | Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> | 2010-10-27 19:16:27 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2010-10-28 10:27:01 -0700 |
| commit | b1fcf55eea541af9efa5d39f5a0d1aec8ceca55d (patch) | |
| tree | a021b6abde9c784d67ee0de3bb7fb31f7d5b2e9f /net/dccp/dccp.h | |
| parent | dc841e30eaea9f9f83c9ab1ee0b3ef9e5c95ce8a (diff) | |
| download | linux-b1fcf55eea541af9efa5d39f5a0d1aec8ceca55d.tar.gz linux-b1fcf55eea541af9efa5d39f5a0d1aec8ceca55d.tar.xz | |
dccp: Refine the wait-for-ccid mechanism
This extends the existing wait-for-ccid routine so that it may be used with
different types of CCID, addressing the following problems:
1) The queue-drain mechanism only works with rate-based CCIDs. If CCID-2 for
example has a full TX queue and becomes network-limited just as the
application wants to close, then waiting for CCID-2 to become unblocked
could lead to an indefinite delay (i.e., application "hangs").
2) Since each TX CCID in turn uses a feedback mechanism, there may be changes
in its sending policy while the queue is being drained. This can lead to
further delays during which the application will not be able to terminate.
3) The minimum wait time for CCID-3/4 can be expected to be the queue length
times the current inter-packet delay. For example if tx_qlen=100 and a delay
of 15 ms is used for each packet, then the application would have to wait
for a minimum of 1.5 seconds before being allowed to exit.
4) There is no way for the user/application to control this behaviour. It would
be good to use the timeout argument of dccp_close() as an upper bound. Then
the maximum time that an application is willing to wait for its CCIDs to can
be set via the SO_LINGER option.
These problems are addressed by giving the CCID a grace period of up to the
`timeout' value.
The wait-for-ccid function is, as before, used when the application
(a) has read all the data in its receive buffer and
(b) if SO_LINGER was set with a non-zero linger time, or
(c) the socket is either in the OPEN (active close) or in the PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ
state (client application closes after receiving CloseReq).
In addition, there is a catch-all case of __skb_queue_purge() after waiting for
the CCID. This is necessary since the write queue may still have data when
(a) the host has been passively-closed,
(b) abnormal termination (unread data, zero linger time),
(c) wait-for-ccid could not finish within the given time limit.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/dccp/dccp.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/dccp/dccp.h | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/dccp/dccp.h b/net/dccp/dccp.h index 3eb264b60823..a8ed459508b2 100644 --- a/net/dccp/dccp.h +++ b/net/dccp/dccp.h @@ -243,8 +243,9 @@ extern void dccp_reqsk_send_ack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, extern void dccp_send_sync(struct sock *sk, const u64 seq, const enum dccp_pkt_type pkt_type); -extern void dccp_write_xmit(struct sock *sk, int block); -extern void dccp_write_space(struct sock *sk); +extern void dccp_write_xmit(struct sock *sk); +extern void dccp_write_space(struct sock *sk); +extern void dccp_flush_write_queue(struct sock *sk, long *time_budget); extern void dccp_init_xmit_timers(struct sock *sk); static inline void dccp_clear_xmit_timers(struct sock *sk) |